Closed Loop

Closed-loop (feedback) control measures the output and corrects the error. Learn the feedback equation, loop gain, sensitivity, disturbance rejection, steady-state error, and the stability trade-off feedback introduces.

A closed-loop system continuously compares the measured output with the desired value and acts on the difference — the error. A thermostat measures room temperature and switches the heater; cruise control measures speed and adjusts the throttle.

Feedback makes systems accurate despite imperfect models and disturbances, can make slow systems faster, and can even stabilise unstable plants. The price is that too much feedback gain can cause oscillation.

An analogy

Driving a car is closed-loop control: your eyes measure the lane position, your brain computes the error and your hands correct the steering — continuously, so wind and road camber barely matter.

The feedback loop

Reference → summing junction → controller → plant → output, with a sensor feeding the output back to the summing junction (usually subtracted — negative feedback). The controller acts on the error, not on the reference directly.

Why high loop gain helps

When GH ≫ 1, T ≈ 1/H: the output depends on the sensor, not the plant. Plant variations and disturbances are divided by (1 + GH). This is why op-amp circuits with huge open-loop gain behave exactly as their resistor ratios dictate.

Steady-state error and system type

With proportional control of a plant without integrators (type 0), a step leaves a residual error 1/(1 + K_p). Each integrator in the loop removes error for one more class of input: type 1 has zero step error, type 2 zero ramp error. This is the reason controllers add integral action.

The cost: stability and noise

Feedback adds phase lag around the loop. When the loop gain is ≥ 1 at a frequency where the phase lag reaches 180°, the feedback becomes positive and the system oscillates. High gain also feeds sensor noise into the actuator. Control design balances performance, robustness and noise — the 'waterbed effect' says you can't reduce sensitivity at all frequencies at once.

Formulas

Worked example: Desensitising gain changes

Given: Forward gain A = 100; Feedback β = 0.1; A drops to 50 (−50 %)

Find: Closed-loop gain before and after.

Answer: 9.09 → 8.33: feedback cut the effect six-fold

Worked example: Steady-state error

Given: G(s) = 10/(s + 1); Unity feedback, unit step

Find: Steady-state error.

Answer: 9.1 % error — add integral action to remove it

Common mistakes

Applications

Key takeaways

Going further